Sunday, March 17, 2019

Decision-Making Models Essay -- Decision Making

Decision-Making ModelsNegotiations and decisions are a part of everyday business. In order to moderate a prospering decision, it is necessary to understand how to make rational and exit decisions. Decisions that are rash, do on snap judgments, and past experiences can prove detrimental to a business. A deficit in basic thinking and decision qualification is felt at all levels of an organization (Gary, 1997). Decisions can have languish term and short term impacts on organizations and their world in which they follow (Turner & Dean, 2008). In order to understand the process of making a sound and good decision, it is necessary to define and understand several decision-making models. These models help to make clear the issues to be addressed and the goals that need to be obtained before a final decision is made. This paper will discuss the zero heart bet, win-win, satisfying solutions, and the fixed pie models. Zero-sum game can play an important piece wherein one entity w ants or needs to dominate the other. Of the several decision-making models that can be implemented, the zero sum game is one decision model utilize in negotiations. In this instance, there is a winner and a fall awayr. there is no give and take or compromise. The zero-sum can be seen in chess only one player can win. However, in Monopoly, if it is not played with the intention of having one winner, but several players to place, is a non-zero-sum game, ilkwise known as a win-win (US department of state, n.d.).The second model is the non-zero, alike known as the win-win model. This is used in compromises so that each of the players feels like a winner. The total amount gained is variable therefore, both players win and lose objectives (Heylighen, 1993). In this model, eac... ...9712C, 15-18.Heylighen, F. (2000). Principia Cybernetica Web, in Heylighen, F., Joslyn, C. and Turchin, V. (eds) Principia Cybernetica Web. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http// ESUGAM.htmlSpangler, B. (2003). Distributive bargaining Beyond Intractability. Guy burgess & Heidi Burgess (eds.). Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Retrieved November 16, 2010, from http// Turner & Dean (2008). scrutiny the effects of prior performance on decision regret Doubling-down, or all bets are off? Journal of Global Business Issues 2, 1 13.U.S. Department of State (n.d.). Consulate General of the United States Zero sum game between russia and the U.S. is gone with the cold war. Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http//

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.