Financial position: Based on the fiscal physical composition in 2009 Johnson & Jonson total net income is $12B, so this is an indicator that the monetary position for Johnson & Johnson is very right and thats why we ingest it a high rate. For proctor & Gamble the total net income is closely $11B and its less than J&J, resembling for Novartis total income is $8B so we repay them same rate. Advertising: P&R have the highest outlay on advertising with $4.18B according to Ad Age, and past J&J comes next with $2.1B, and the Novartis is the lowest company that spent on advertising. R&D: Include the number of product innovations the undeviating brings to commercialize, the more the company spent on R&D the more it will produced products first, hence steal the more food market share. Novartis is highest company that pays for R&D in 2009 with $7.5B, J&J spent $7B its not that different between both companies, wherefore P&G follow them and spent $3.2B.
Management: We didnt make out any differences to say that one company is better than the antonym in the field of management, but in general on the whole these three companies have a very good answer management staff and thats why we gave them a same rate. intersection quality: The physical integrity of products created by the firm, Since each(prenominal) these companies parcel out away with sensitive product that touches people life, they should ensure that they partner off all the requirements, so all pharmaceutical companies have just about exchangeable standards to know if the quality of products have met or not .If you fate to line a full essay, order i! t on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper